Assessment of Biventricular Function by Echocardiography in Patients with Right Ventricular Apical Pacing

Authors

  • Rakesh Tumula Department of Cardiology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Nrushen Peesapati Department of Cardiology, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2021.8.1.3

Keywords:

Left ventricle function, Permanent pacemaker, Right ventricle function, VVI mode

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial cardiac pacing is a consolidated, safe, and effective treatment strategy that has been evolving for 60 years. In a normal heart, the left ventricle (LV) contracts in a fast and synchronized manner. Stimulation anywhere in the right ventricle (RV) alters the natural pattern of activation and as a consequence the ventricular contraction. This may lead to the induction of asynchrony with potential risk for the development of ventricular dysfunction. The majority of studies have looked into left ventricular dysfunction, while effects on the RV have not been studied. Furthermore, there are little data on the chronology of events that occur in pacemaker patients. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate diastolic and systolic functions of LV and RV in consecutive patients undergoing Ventricle is paced, sensed, and the pulse generator inhibits pacing output in response to a sensed ventricular event (VVI) permanent pacemaker implantation over 6 months using trans-thoracic echocardiography. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based observational study from October 2017 to April 2019. Conclusion: Diastolic abnormalities are first to appear which are followed by appearance of systolic abnormalities of the respective ventricles. The right ventricular dysfunction (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <17 mm) developed in 28% at 1 month and in 62% at the end of 6 months. The left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction< 50%) occurs later, LV dysfunction developed in 14%, and worsening of LV function developed in 16% of the study population at the end of study, that is, 6 months.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ferrari AD, Borges AP, Albuquerque LC, Sussenbach CP, da Rosa PR, Piantá RM, et al. Cardiomyopathy induced by artificial cardiac pacing: Myth or reality sustained by evidence? Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2014;29:402-13.

De Sá LA, Rassi S, Batista MA. Is conventional cardiac pacing harmful in patients with normal ventricular function? Arq Bras Cardiol 2013;101:545-53.

Dwivedi S, Bansal S, Puri A, Makharia M, Narain V, Saran R, et al. Diastolic and systolic right ventricular dysfunction precedes left ventricular dysfunction in patients paced from right ventricular apex. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2006;6:142-52.

Samet P, Bernstein WH, Nathan DA, López A. Atrial contribution to cardiac output in complete heart block. Am J Cardiol 1965;16:1-10.

Kroetz FW, Leonard JJ, Shaver JA, Leon DF, Lancaster JF, Beamer VL. The effect of atrial contraction on left ventricular performance in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1967;35:852-67.

Geka RK. Physiological cardiac pacing and its methods. Rinsho Kyobu Geka 1982;2:291-4.

Nathan AW, Davies DW. Is VVI pacing outmoded? Br Heart J 1992;67:285-8.

Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PE. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994;344:1523-8.

Pehrsson SK, Åström H, Bone D. Left ventricular volumes with ventricular inhibited and atrial triggered ventricular pacing. Acta Med Scand 1983;214:305-10.

Sethi KK, Bajaj V, Mohan JC, Arora R, Khalilullah M. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias. Indian Heart J 1990;42:143-7.

Dalia T, Amr BS. Pacemaker indications. In: Stat Pearls. Treasure Island, FL: Stat Pearls Publishing; 2020.

The NASPE/BPEG Generic Pacemaker Code for Anti Bradyarrhythmia and Adaptive‐Rate Pacing and Anti Tachyarrhythmia Devices Request PDF; 2020.

Gregoratos G, Cheitlin MD, Conill A, Epstein AE, Fellows C, Ferguson TB, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices: Executive summary-a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on pacemaker implantation). Circulation 1998;97:1325-35.

Van Hemel NM, van der Wall EE. 8 October 1958, D day for the implantable pacemaker. Neth Heart J 2008;16 Suppl 1:S3-4.

Lamas GA, Ellenbogen KA. Evidence base for pacemaker mode selection: From physiology to randomized trials. Circulation 2004;109:443-51.

De Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic : Assessment of BI ventricular function by echocardiography effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: A quantitative review. Europace 2003;5:275-8.

De Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: A quantitative review. Europace 2003;5:275-8.

Tantengco MV, Thomas RL, Karpawich PP. Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term right ventricular apical pacing in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:2093-100.

Nelson GS, Curry CW, Wyman BT, Kramer A, Declerck J, Talbot M, et al. Predictors of systolic augmentation from left ventricular preexcitation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay. Circulation 2000;101:2703-9.

Prinzen FW, Peschar M. Relation between the pacing induced sequence of activation and left ventricular pump function in animals. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2002;25:484-98.

Vassallo JA, Cassidy DM, Miller JM, Buxton AE, Marchlinski FE, Josephson ME. Left ventricular endocardial activation during right ventricular pacing: Effect of underlying heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:1228-33.

Lee MA, Dae MW, Langberg JJ, Griffin JC, Chin MC, Finkbeiner WE, et al. Effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular perfusion, innervation, function and histology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:225-32.

Cosedis NJ, Rud AH, Bloch TP, Leif T, Thomas MP, Thomas V, et al. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation 1998;97:987-95.

Nahlawi M, Waligora M, Spies SM, Bonow RO, Kadish AH, Goldberger JJ. Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1883-8.

Ebert M, Jander N, Minners J, Blum T, Doering M, Bollmann A, et al. long‐term impact of right ventricular pacing on left ventricular systolic function in pacemaker recipients with preserved ejection fraction: Results from a large single‐center registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e003485.

Sisu RC, Cinteza M, Vinereanu D. Interventricular septal or standard apical pacing in pacing dependent patients: Still a dilemma? Maedica (Bucur) 2010;5:193-200.

Leclercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Daubert C. Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J 1995;129:1133-41.

De Sá LA, Rassi S, Batista MA. Is conventional cardiac pacing harmful in patients with normal ventricular function? Arq Bras Cardiol 2013;101:545-53.

Faerestrand S, Ohm OJ. A time-related study by Doppler and M-mode echocardiography of hemodynamics, heart size, and AV valvular function during activity-sensing rate-responsive ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1987;10:507-18.

Leclercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Daubert C. Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing. Am Heart J 1995;129:1133-41.

Rosenqvist M, Isaaz K, Botvinick EH, Dae MW, Cockrell J, Abbott JA, et al. Relative importance of activation sequence compared to atrioventricular synchrony in left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:148-56.

Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: The dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA 2002;288:3115-23.

Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:877-83.

Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854-62.

Barold SS, Herweg B, Sweeney MO. Minimizing right ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:966-9.

Barold SS. Adverse effects of ventricular desynchronization induced by long-term right ventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:624-6.

Brunner M, Olschewski M, Geibel A, Bode C, Zehender M. Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation. Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics. Eur Heart J 2004;25:88-95.

Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932-7.

Simantirakis EN, Vardakis KE, Kochiadakis GE, Manios EG, Igoumenidis NE, Brignole M, et al. Left ventricular mechanics during right ventricular apical or left ventricular-based pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1013-8.

Lupi G, Sassone B, Badano L, Peraldo C, Gaddi O, Sitges M, et al. effects of right ventricular pacing on intra-left ventricular electromechanical activation in patients with native narrow QRS. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:219-22.

Xiao HB, Brecker SJ, Gibson DG. Differing effects of right ventricular pacing and left bundle branch block on left ventricular function. Br Heart J 1993;69:166-73.

Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L,et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1-39.e14.

Lee MA, Dae MW, Langberg JJ, Griffin JC, Chin MC, Finkbeiner WE, et al. Effects of long-term right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular perfusion, innervation, function and histology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:225-32.

Marketou ME, Simantirakis EN, Prassopoulos VK, Chrysostomakis SI, Velidaki AA, Karkavitsas NS, et al. Assessment of myocardial adrenergic innervation in patients with sick sinus syndrome: Effect of asynchronous ventricular activation from ventricular apical stimulation. Heart 2002;88:255-9.

Nakata T, Miyamoto K, Doi A, Sasao H, Wakabayashi T, Kobayashi H, et al. Cardiac death prediction and impaired cardiac sympathetic innervation assessed by MIBG in patients with failing and nonfailing hearts. J Nucl Cardiol 1998;5:579-90.

Johnson M, Hunt W, Charlotte H, Capener D, Charlie E, Robin C, et al. Tricuspid deceleration time predicts right atrial pressure in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension: Preliminary experience with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Respir J 2015;46 Suppl 59:PA3749. Available from: https://www.erj.ersjournals. [Last accessed on 2020 Apr 14].

Kanse VY, Chongtham DS, Salam KS, Nemichandra SC, Upretti S, Singh SD. Clinical profiles and outcomes of patients undergoing pacemaker implantation. J Med Soc 2015;29:40.

Silva RT, Filho MM, de Oliveira JC, de Lima CE, Martins DG, Guirao CI, et al. Ventricular remodeling in right ventricular apical pacing. Arq Bras Cardiol 2007;88:152-8.

Ahmed M, Gorcsan J, Marek J, Ryo K, Haugaa K, Ludwig DR, et al. Right ventricular apical pacing-induced left ventricular dyssynchrony is associated with a subsequent decline in ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:602-8.

Connolly SJ, Kerr C, Gent M, Yusuf S. Dual-chamber versus ventricular pacing. Circulation 1996;94:578-83.

Markewitz A, Schad N, Hemmer W, Bernheim C, Ciavolella M, Weinhold C. What is the most appropriate stimulation mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986;9:1115-20.

Morbidity and Mortality of Patients with Sinus Node Disease: Comparative Effects of Atrial and Ventricular Pacing-ZANINI-1990-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology-Wiley Online Library; 2020.

Zanini R, Facchinetti AI, Gallo G, Cazzamalli L, Bonandi L, Cas LD. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990;13:2076-9.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-26

How to Cite

Rakesh Tumula, & Nrushen Peesapati. (2021). Assessment of Biventricular Function by Echocardiography in Patients with Right Ventricular Apical Pacing. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 8(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2021.8.1.3