Community Prevalence and Risk Factors for Psychological Abuse in India

Authors

  • Thenmozhi Mani Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Ambily Nadaraj Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Bijesh Yadav Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Malavika Babu Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Shuba Kumar Samarth, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Shrikant I Bangdiwala Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and Statistics Director, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2021.8.1.11

Keywords:

Alcoholism, Culture, Dowry, Education, Psychological violence

Abstract

Violence against women has been recognized by the United Nations as a fundamental violation of women’s human rights. Although there is a good amount of research on physical violence, very little on psychological abuse from Indian researchers. In India too, domestic violence is prevalent in all sections of the community. The objectives of the study are to find the prevalence of psychological abuse in different stratum in India and the risk factors of psychological violence. A cross-sectional study based on 9938 women in rural, urban, and urban non-slum sites across India was conducted in 1998–1999. Logistic regression was done to find the risk factors of psychological violence. Despite the limitations of the 9426 women responded psychological violence, 3306 (35.1%) (95%CI: 23.1, 47.0) reported any psychological abuse in the past 1 year. The women who had lower education, from lower socioeconomic status (SES) and whose mothers-in-law not satisfied with dowry had higher risk for psychological abuse. There was a synergistic effect in psychological abuse if the woman is from low SES and the husband is an alcoholic and the risk is 7.4 times higher as compared to women who did not have both. However, alcoholism had significant independent effect when this was interacted with satisfaction of dowry. We suggest that the families should avoid asking and giving dowries. Besides these, the newly married women should be counseled to handle the conflicts at the family level so that the physical and psychological abuses can be avoided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Heise L, Garcia-Moreno C. Violence by intimate partners. In: Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R, editors. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 89-121.

Ackerson LK, Kawachi I, Barbeau EM, Subramanian SV. Effects of individual and proximate educational context on intimate partner violence: A population-based study of women in India. Am J Public Health 2008;98:507-14.

Houry D, Kaslow NJ, Thompson MP. Depressive symptoms in women experiencing intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence 2005;20:1467-77.

Forte T, Cohen MM, Du Mont J, Hyman I, Romans S. Psychological and physical sequelae of intimate partner violence among women with limitations in their activities of daily living. Arch Womens Ment Health 2005;8:248-56.

Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 2006;368:1260-9.

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Violence against Women: An EU-wide Survey. Main Results Report. Vienna, Austria: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; 2014.

Menon SA, Kanekar S. Attitudes toward sexual harassment of women in India. J Appl Soc Psychol 1992;22:1940-52.

Fernandez M. Domestic violence by extended family members in India: Interplay of gender and generation. J Interpers Violence 1997;12:433-55.

Kavitha VR. Spousal domestic violence of married women in India. J Sociol Soc Anthropol 2012;3:7-13.

Andersson N, Cockcroft A, Ansari U, Omer K, Ansari NM, Khan A, et al. Barriers to disclosing and reporting violence among women in Pakistan: Findings from a national household survey and focus group discussions. J Interpers Violence 2010;25:1965-85.

Fanslow JL, Robinson EM. Help-seeking behaviors and reasons for help seeking reported by a representative sample of women victims of intimate partner violence in New Zealand. J Interpers Violence 2010;25:929-51.

Paul S. Intimate partner violence and womens help-seeking behaviour: Evidence from India. J Interdiscip Econ 2016;28:53-82.

Spencer RA, Shahrouri M, Halasa L, Khalaf I, Clark CJ. Women’s help seeking for intimate partner violence in Jordan. Health Care Women Int 2014;35:380-99.

Babu BV, Kar SK. Domestic violence against women in eastern India: A population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health 2009;9:129.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; 2017. p. 671.

Bhat M, Ullman SE. Examining marital violence in India: Review and recommendations for future research and practice. Trauma Violence Abuse 2014;15:57-74.

Go VF, Johnson SC, Bentley ME, Sivaram S, Srikrishnan AK, Celentano DD, et al. Crossing the threshold: Engendered definitions of socially acceptable domestic violence in Chennai, India. Cult Health Sex 2003;5:393-408.

Krishnan S, Subbiah K, Khanum S, Chandra PS, Padian NS. An intergenerational women’s empowerment intervention to mitigate domestic violence: Results of a pilot study in Bengaluru, India. Violence Against Women 2012;18:346-70.

Tichy LL, Becker JV, Sisco MM. The downside of patriarchal benevolence: Ambivalence in addressing domestic violence and socio-economic considerations for women of Tamil Nadu, India. J Fam Violence 2009;24:547-58.

Sadowski LS, Hunter WM, Bangdiwala SI, Muñoz SR. The world studies of abuse in the family environment (WorldSAFE): A model of a multi-national study of family violence. Inj Control Saf Promot 2004;11:81-90.

Census of India, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. Primary Census Abstract for Slum. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner; 2011.

Jeyaseelan L, Kumar S, Neelakantan N, Peedicayil A, Pillai R, Duvvury N. Physical spousal violence against women in India: Some risk factors. J Biosoc Sci 2007;39:657-70.

Jejeebhoy SJ. Associations between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: Impressions from a survey in rural India. Stud Fam Plann 1998;29:300-8.

Schuler SR, Hashemi SM, Riley AP, Akhter S. Credit programs, patriarchy and men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:1729-42.

Bangdiwala SI, Ramiro L, Sadowski LS, Bordin IA, Hunter W, Shankar V. Intimate partner violence and the role of socioeconomic indicators in WorldSAFE communities in Chile, Egypt, India and the Philippines. Inj Control Saf Promot 2004;11:101-9.

Heise LL. Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women 1998;4:262-90.

Jeyaseelan L, Sadowski LS, Kumar S, Hassan F, Ramiro L, Beatriz V. World studies of abuse in the family environment--risk factors for physical intimate partner violence. Inj Control Saf Promot 2004;11:117-24.

Rao V. Wife-beating in rural South India: A qualitative and econometric analysis. Soc Sci Med 1997;44:1169-80.

Stuart GL, Ramsey SE, Moore TM, Kahler CW, Farrell LE, Recupero PR, et al. Reductions in marital violence following treatment for alcohol dependence. J Interpers Violence 2003;18:1113-31.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-26

How to Cite

Thenmozhi Mani, Ambily Nadaraj, Bijesh Yadav, Malavika Babu, Shuba Kumar, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, & Lakshmanan Jeyaseelan. (2021). Community Prevalence and Risk Factors for Psychological Abuse in India. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 8(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2021.8.1.11