A comparative study of ropivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.75% for spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery in ASA Grade – I/II adult patients: A prospective study

Authors

  • Shakti Singhal Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College & Hospital, New Delhi, India
  • Gunjan Agrawal Sanjay Gandhi Hospital, New Delhi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2018.5.2.14

Keywords:

Ropivacaine, spinal needle, Spinal anaesthesia

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.75% in spinal anesthesia under: (a) Onset and duration of sensory and motor block, (b) duration of analgesia, and (c) adverse effects. Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia were divided into two groups (I and II) of 30 each. Group I received 3ml of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% Group II received 3 ml of isobaric ropivacaine 0.75%. The study parameters were recorded at baseline and then at specified intervals. Statistics: By professional statisticians using SPSS 18 version. Student t-test was used for continuous variables, and Chi-square test was used for discrete variables. Results: The onset of sensory blockage in Group I was 3.17 ± 1.29 min and 2.60 ± 1.19 min in Group II which was statistically not significant (P > 0.05). The onset of motor blockade in Group I was 3.90 ± 1.54 min and 3.10 ± 0.96 min in Group II which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Median time to reach the highest level of analgesia was 12.4 ± 2.81 min in Group I, and 10.7 ± 2.56 min in Group II. The difference was statistically significant. Regression of sensory level to T10 dermatome in Group I was 99.64 ± 21.30 min and 139.66 ± 25.70 min in Group II which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Duration of the motor blockade in Group I was 126 ± 14.53 min and 175 ± 30.60 min in Group II which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The time of the first request of analgesics in Group I was 130 ± 16.24 min and 171.1 ± 32.77 min in Group II which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the adverse effects of both drugs. Conclusions: Intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% in comparison to isobaric ropivacaine 0.5%: (1) Produces quicker onset of motor block and prolonged duration of sensory and motor block. (2) Does not alter hemodynamic stability. (3) Has no difference in the onset of sensory block. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Shakti Singhal, Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar Medical College & Hospital, New Delhi, India

Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, 

Gunjan Agrawal, Sanjay Gandhi Hospital, New Delhi

Department of Pathology, 

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Shakti Singhal, & Gunjan Agrawal. (2018). A comparative study of ropivacaine 0.5% versus ropivacaine 0.75% for spinal anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery in ASA Grade – I/II adult patients: A prospective study. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 5(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.21276/apjhs.2018.5.2.14